Tectonic Plates Moved Earlier Than Previously Thought

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new study published in this week's issue of Science concludes that tectonic movement on earth may have started 500 million years earlier than 1.9 billion years ago, a date suggested by current theory. Timothy Kusky and colleagues at St. Louis University, along with researchers from Washington University in St. Louis, found the oldest complete section of oceanic sea floor on the planet last summer. Oceanic earth crust is usually "recycled" back into the mantle through subduction, but a few fragments survive in mountain belts that form during the collision of two tectonic plates. That is exactly what happened with Kusky's sample, found in a mountain belt in the Eastern Hebei Province in China. The sample turned out to be about 2.5 billion years old, dating back to the Archean¿earth's earliest geologic time period.

"This discovery shows that the plate tectonic forces that create oceanic crust on the earth today were in operation more than 2.5 billion years ago," Kusky says. He thinks that these findings could help shed a light on when the first complex organisms evolved on earth: "Because hot volcanic vents on the sea floor have provided the nutrients and temperatures needed for life to flourish and develop, it's possible that life developed and diversified around these vents as plate tectonics began."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe