New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Teenage Flu Scientist Shares His Recipe for Prizewinning Research

The winner of the 2013 Google Science Fair on why more kids should e-mail scientists

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What inspired your Google Science Fair project, in which you created six new potential flu drugs?

I live in San Diego, where some of the first cases of 2009 H1N1 swine flu took place in the U.S. It was then that I made the realization that flu can kill a lot of people. I thought, “Why can't we use the new computer power at our fingertips to speed up drug discovery and find new flu medicine?” I came across Dr. Rommie Amaro of the University of California, San Diego, and she was willing to let me work in her computational lab.

How did you find chemical compounds that would target and disarm a particular protein inside the flu virus?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


I bounced between a computer lab and a biological wet lab. I first used computers to screen through a library of almost half a million compounds and reduce that to a top 237. Then I took those 237 and went to a biological wet lab and actually tested them for activity against the flu virus. I came out with those six top inhibitors.

One of the strategies you used is called molecular dynamic simulation. How does that work?

It uses supercomputer power to simulate every atom of a flu protein moving in solution. Previously, scientists had worked with static snapshots of this same protein.

With molecular dynamic simulation, you can see all the possible pockets within a protein that you could build your inhibitor into and what fraction of the time these pockets appear.

What's next?

These are still pretty early in the drug-discovery pipeline. I haven't done any animal studies. What I'm now working on is giving these inhibitors good druglike traits. They have to be very potent, first of all, but they also can't be toxic.

You also do a lot of science outreach to younger kids. Why is that important to you?

Ever since I was 15, I was very, very driven to do research, and because of that I ran right through obstacles, such as e-mailing professors I didn't know. But a lot of these younger students, they're afraid to try.

I'm really trying to dig in the idea that when you do scientific research, you're doing stuff that nobody has done before. If I can give other students a taste of that discovery feeling, they may be more willing to face future obstacles.

Anna Kuchment is a contributing editor at Scientific American and a staff science reporter at the Dallas Morning News. She is also co-author of a forthcoming book about earthquakes triggered by energy production.

More by Anna Kuchment
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Looking for a Flu Killer” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 6 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1213-16a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe