Teflon Parts Could Cause the Environment Harm

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Fluorinated polymers¿a class of compounds that includes the non-stick novelty Teflon¿may be responsible for an increase in long-lived environmental contaminants, according to new research from Canadian scientists. Their report, published in today's issue of Nature, suggests that the degradation of fluorinated polymers at high temperatures is pumping unexpectedly large amounts of trifluroacetic acid (TFA) into the environment.

TFA enters the atmosphere when hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and hydroflurocarbons (HFCs) break down and it exits in rainwater. (Both HCFCs and HFCs are coolant chemicals that industries now use in place of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), compounds that persist longer in the atmosphere and degrade the ozone layer.) When the scientists analyzed rainwater samples, however, they found more TFA than the CFC-replacement gases could explain. "We unexpectedly discovered the TFA levels have far exceeded that amount and we wanted to know why," says David A. Ellis, a University of Toronto chemist and the lead author of the study.

The scientists guessed that the excess TFA came from human activity because there are no naturally occurring compounds that degrade to form TFA. Also, levels of TFA measured near cities were much higher than those in rural areas. The researchers suspected fluoropolymers¿which coat surfaces as varied as frying pans to car engine parts¿as the likely source.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To test their theory, they subjected small amounts of the pure polymers to temperatures as high as those used to burn domestic waste and then analyzed the products. They discovered a variety of compounds, including TFA and hexafluoropropene (HFP), which can react efficiently with molecules in the troposphere to produce TFA. The scientists also heated commercial products containing fluoropolymers and obtained similar results. They conclude that "further studies are needed to quantify the actual emissions of these compounds from various sources."

In 1997, companies bought more than 80,000 tonnes of fluorinated polymers for commercial uses. That sales figure continues to rise, the scientists say, and could result in the accumulation of compounds in the environment. "High concentrations of TFA in water can be mildly phytotoxic [toxic to plants] but, more importantly, it will take decades for TFA to degrade," notes Scott Mabury, a University of Toronto chemistry professor who supervised the study. "We don¿t know what the long-term environmental impacts are."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe