Telescope Sees Known Pulsar in New Light

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

An experimental telescope called InFOCuS has given NASA scientists a fresh look at a well-known pulsar. The image is compiled using data from higher-energy x-rays than those collected by other current instruments such as the Chandra X-ray Observatory. "In this new pulsar picture we are seeing aspects no one has seen before," says NASA project scientist Hans Krimm. "The x-ray band of the electromagnetic spectrum is huge, and until now, we were only seeing a sliver of this--sort of like viewing the colors red and orange but not higher-energy blues and violets."

InFOCuS is the first component of a proposed satellite mission called Constellation-X--which scientists hope will have sufficient light-collecting power to observe matter falling into black holes--scheduled to be launched early in the next decade. At the heart of InFOCuS is a different kind of detector that allows high-energy x-rays to be focused without too much scattering. Multilayer mirrors containing carbon and platinum, arranged precisely with the newly developed detector, collected light from the pulsar 4U 0115+63, which is some 23,000 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Cassiopeia. In September, a 20-hour balloon flight at an elevation of 128,000 feet allowed InFOCuS to compile the new image (above).

The latest pulsar picture is a bit fuzzy compared to shots taken by Chandra, but it does provide astronomers with new information about pulsars. And the NASA team hopes that down the road future flights will include improved mirrors that will increase the resolution of high-energy images of this type. "The beauty of balloons is that we can test these cutting-edge technologies for relatively little money,¿ notes principal investigator Jack Tueller. ¿We plan to fly InFOCuS several more times in the next few years."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American