Telling the Age of a Horse

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It is generally believed that the age of a horse can be determined by the number of wrinkles over his eye; but a correspondent writing from Monterey, Ala., informs us that this is not a reliable rule. He says, " There is a horse in this section of country which is thirty years old, and has no sign of a wrinkle over his eye; while there are others not over five years old that have wrinkles." A GENTLE HINT.—We often wonder why so many inventors who send models to us neglect to put their names and Post Office address upon them. We are often exceedingly bothered in this way, and if those negligent ones could only get a view of our anxious faces, and know the trouble and pains we are at to find out upon whom we can justly fix the paternity of these apparently fathomless cases, we are sure that in all coming time no gentle hint of this kind will be needed.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 37This article was published with the title “Telling the Age of a Horse” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 37 (), p. 294
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05221858-294g

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe