New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Telltale Hearts: What Autopsies Reveal about This Vital Organ

Despite advances in medical imaging, an autopsy still gives experts the best picture of what ails us

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The human heart endures a lot in a lifetime. Sophisticated imaging can give insight into what it tolerates and what ails it, but the most direct information comes from an autopsy.

Photographer Angela Strass­heim spent days at an undisclosed morgue in 2000, capturing the organ moments after its removal. She left with a series of images that show hearts pierced by a gunshot wound, damaged by obesity, affected by cancer and weakened by a drug overdose. In the center is a child’s healthy heart. The photographs are being published here for the first time. 

Comparing the hearts of healthy and obese individuals demonstrates how the latter get remodeled in unhealthy ways. Michael Lauer of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute says research suggests that fat exerts toxic effects not only on the coronary arteries but on the heart muscle itself. In the image, fat visibly surrounds the organ, and the muscle is enlarged. The effects of drugs and of cancer that spreads to the heart are less visible here; both conditions can alter valve function and blood flow.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite their importance for research, autopsies are on the decline. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that rates dropped by more than 50 percent between 1972 and 2007 because of such factors as changes in state laws that govern which deaths can be investigated, as well as a lack of insurance coverage for the procedure.

Although there have been advances in postmortem imaging, the technology has failed to diagnose some instances of heart disease and cancer. In an Annals of Internal Medicine editorial earlier this year, Elizabeth Burton and Mahmud Mossa-Basha of Johns Hopkins University said that until imaging technologies improve, “autopsy remains the gold standard for determining the cause of death.”

This article was published in print as "Telltale Hearts."

Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Telltale Hearts: What Autopsies Reveal about This Vital Organ” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican052012-18fhG5NuZ4upDReUc7OtTL

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe