New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Telomerase Gene 'Anti-Therapy' Stalls Tumors Growing in Culture

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For cancer cells to grow unchecked¿their most notable and lethal trait¿they must divide indefinitely. In normal adult cells, caps at the ends of chromosomes, called telomeres, prevent such activity. Each time a cell replicates, part of the cap is lost and so eventually the cell can no longer divide. But cancer cells get around this natural countdown by reactivating telomerase, an enzyme that rebuilds the telomere tips after each successive split. Now Elizabeth Blackburn, a co-discoverer of telomerase, and her colleagues at the University of California at San Francisco say they have found a way to disrupt the enzyme in tumor cells. And in a series of experiments, described today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, their method slowed or halted the growth of cancer cells in culture and in mice.

The researchers inserted a very tiny mutation in a gene that encodes telomerase RNA¿a short sequence of RNA that acts as a template for building the DNA telomere tips. The change did not affect all of the telomeres in test cells but rather "uncapped" a few per cell, Blackburn says. Still, it was enough to prompt a DNA damage response in most of the cells, causing them to stop dividing or actually commit suicide. "We were quite surprised at how strong the effect was," Blackburn says. "Cancer cells are tough. They usually ignore the signals that tell them to commit suicide. But by spiking the telomerase enzyme with just a little bad telomerase, we saw a powerful effect."

The researchers now plan to explore the therapeutic potential of the approach further. They will first test the method on human cancer cells newly derived from patients, which may behave differently from the cultured cells in the experiments reported here. And they will investigate other ways to alter the gene (gene anti-therapies), as well as small molecules that might warp telomerase in the same way. Because normal cells do not produce telomerase, any remedy that affects it should not damage healthy tissues¿a major drawback of many current cancer treatments. "Success will depend on the details and identifying a method of delivery," Blackburn says, "but it is one of many reasonable targets out there."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe