New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Testing Lethality

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Plates of sugar could indicate the deadliness of a flu strain. The influenza virus infects the body using hemagglutinin, a viral protein that latches onto sugars containing sialic acids on human cell surfaces. Scripps Research Institute investigators and their colleagues developed arrays containing 200 different carbohydrates and sugary proteins, representing the major types of molecules to which hemagglutinin might attach. They tested eight different flu strains, including the deadly 1918 influenza, and discovered that alterations at as few as two positions on the hemagglutinin protein can transform a bird strain into one that can infect humans. The scientists, who report the work in the February 3 Journal of Molecular Biology, say that the arrays could explain why the 1918 flu, which strongly resembles avian viruses, was so devastating. They could also lead to monitors that quickly determine how close another bird strain is to mutating into a pandemic form.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Testing Lethality” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 3 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0306-32b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe