New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

That's Nice, Now Get Out: Why We Sometimes Punish Generosity

Generosity is sometimes unwelcome

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It’s no surprise that humans dislike greediness. But a study in the August issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that people sometimes punish generosity, too.

The subjects played a computer game where opponents put points (worth money) into a common pot. Afterward, subjects often voted to kick out of the group computer-controlled players who put in more points and took less than the others.

Perhaps people recoiled because the overgivers violated social norms—rules are rules, even if breaking them benefits everyone—or because they set high standards that players are reluctant to measure up to. Because of our natural aversion to inequality, the study authors say, we sometimes find generosity as annoying as selfishness.

SA Mind Vol 21 Issue 5This article was published with the title “That's Nice, Now Get Out: Why We Sometimes Punish Generosity” in SA Mind Vol. 21 No. 5 (), p. 7
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1110-7c

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe