The 9 Best Reactions to the House Science Committee’s Breitbart Tweet

Experts condemn lawmakers’ decision to promote fallacious article from conservative news site

Texas Rep. Lamar Smith.

Ryan J. Reilly *Flickr* (CC BY 2.0)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

On Thursday the United States House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, run by Texas Republican Lamar Smith, retweeted a Breitbart News story that dismissed climate change as “a scare” manufactured by “alarmists”. An overwhelming majority of climate scientists agree that the phenomenon is real and primarily the result of human activities, and many of them took to social media to express their dismay (to put it mildly) that the committee, which oversees government offices such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admiration, would promote such a misguided article. Here are a few of the best reactions:

I wrote a brief, public rant on Facebook about that @HouseScience tweet. h/t @hormiga @PeterGleick https://t.co/seUTKycogb pic.twitter.com/Y0PaU7TRhZ

— Karen James (@kejames) December 1, 2016

A classic example of false news. https://t.co/ECOkzeBW9j

The truth? pic.twitter.com/zEZGzOF7vi

— Katharine Hayhoe (@KHayhoe) December 1, 2016

This is fake news, bad science, and basically, crap, from the House Science committee. #climate @HouseScience @BreitbartNews @LamarSmithTX21 https://t.co/60QTHEzO49

— Peter Gleick (@PeterGleick) December 1, 2016

Jesus. The House Science Committee just cited a false Breitbart report that the climate is cooling.

Our Orwellian future is here. https://t.co/KY6CE8JqJz

— Eric Holthaus (@EricHolthaus) December 1, 2016

@HouseScience This committee should have its decision-making privileges revoked for one month. And no Twitter. You're grounded.

— Joe Hanson (@jtotheizzoe) December 1, 2016

False. Inaccurate information. Sad. https://t.co/t7jx4hIyY3

— Tyler Mauldin (@TyTheWeatherGuy) December 2, 2016

suggest Texas based scientists have a word with @LamarSmithTX21 over this @HouseScience tweet? https://t.co/YlxLijRK01

— Sarah Kendrew (@sarahkendrew) December 1, 2016

.@HouseScience congratulations on taking meretricious balance to a new level of stupid by not bothering to give the consensus view at all.

— Michael Merrifield (@ProfMike_M) December 1, 2016

and so the erosion on science begins... https://t.co/88KBddTUbS

— Jessica M (@jayjum) December 2, 2016

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American