New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

The Administration’s War on Facts Is a War on Democracy Itself

Politicians must not interfere with the free and open pursuit of science

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists around the country are nervous as hell. There seems to be a seismic shift happening in Washington, D.C., and our government's relationship with facts, scientific reality and objective truth has never been more strained.

It started with “alternative facts” about the size of the crowd at Donald Trump's inauguration. The White House also asserted, without any evidence, that widespread voter fraud cost Trump the popular vote, even though numerous, bipartisan sources have debunked that claim. My parents' generation would have called such alternative facts falsehoods or even lies. It is not just the peddling of conspiracy theories that is troubling, however. Worse still is that the White House and many members of Congress seem opposed to the very pursuit of facts and have tried to place draconian restrictions on what federal scientists can research, publish or even discuss. And who knows what will happen to our nation's long-standing investments in research and science education?

Science shows us the magnificence of our world. Our oceans hold beautiful coral reefs, bursting with life, gleaming through azure waters. Tropical rain forests teem with creatures, sights and sounds. Here in California we have giant redwoods, reaching skyward, drenched in mist. And off our shores, there are colossal whales, drifting in rich waters, raising their young and singing their ethereal songs.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Through the lens of science, these wonders stir the mind. They awaken our hearts and souls. We instinctively want to share them with the people we love, and preserving them is the greatest gift we can give our children. But science also tells us that these wonders are at risk from widespread habitat loss, pollution and climate change. Science shows us the planet is in trouble, even if many politicians ignore the evidence.

All is not lost, however. Science shows us ways to build a sustainable future—by reinventing our energy system, agriculture and cities. Science can build a future where people and nature thrive together, for generations to come. Ignoring science will doom us to an impoverished, degraded world. Our children deserve better than that, and only science points the way forward.

Ultimately a healthy democracy depends on science. When Congress asked physicist Robert Wilson in 1969 what a new particle accelerator would do to help with national defense, he answered that it would do nothing. The pursuit of scientific truth, he said, “only has to do with the respect with which we regard one another, the dignity of men, our love of culture.” The pursuit of truth, an informed citizenry and the unfettered exchange of ideas are cornerstones of our democracy. They are what make America great. Rejecting evidence and empiricism is a step toward despotism.

There is a long tradition of bipartisan support for science and an evidence-based worldview in the U.S. In fact, the Union of Concerned Scientists has ranked presidents from both parties as exceptional supporters of science, including Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Richard M. Nixon, Jimmy Carter and George H. W. Bush. Wise leaders have almost always recognized the value of independent science to our democracy.

There is something different about the Trump administration. Something troubling, which scientists need to stand up and call out. While we generally avoid political conversations, scientists should always defend facts, objectivity, and scientific independence and integrity. Not doing so would be almost unethical. So to the Trump administration, I would say this: If your apparent disregard for facts is just a series of missteps, so be it. Say so. Fix it. It would be brave. It would be wise. And it would show some class.

But if this is actually part of your governing philosophy, I would give you a warning on behalf of my fellow scientists: Do not mess with us. Do not try to bury the truth. Do not interfere with the free and open pursuit of science. You do so not only at your peril but also at the peril of the nation.

Jonathan Foley is the executive director of Project Drawdown, a nonprofit organization focused on climate solutions. His writing has been featured on the TED stage and in National Geographic, Science, Nature and numerous other publications. These views are his own.

More by Jonathan Foley
Scientific American Magazine Vol 316 Issue 5This article was published with the title “The War on Facts Undermines Democracy” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 316 No. 5 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0517-10

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe