The Aeroplane in Naval Service

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


IN a recent issue of the Paris “Le Temps,” the young French naval officer who has made such a brilliant record as an aviator under the pseudonym of Andre Beaumont, discusses the present status and future possibilities of the aeroplane as a factor in naval maneuvers. We take pleasure in reproducing here the greater part of this interesting exposition, omitting some introductory remarks of a biographical character, and taking up the author's words at the point where he enters upon his main theme.—Ed. Must we seek for marine service the ideal machine which takes flight from the earth, poises itself upon a troubled sea, renews its flight unharmed, executes maneuvers about the' fleet, and then at will returns to land or casts anchor in port? Unfortunately such a machine does not exist to-day, and I am afraid it will not be produced for a year or two, despite the laudable efforts of our constructors, and meanwhile must we be deprived of the aid of aviation in the marine? To my mind that would be a mistake, and we should be depriving ourselves of an auxiliary already powerful and capable of becoming redoubtable if handled with the skill and daring which have always been -among the professional qualities of sailors. Why wait for future progress when the actual state of affairs is so satisfactory? Let the constructors continue their researches; let us help and encourage them, and, if necessary, undertake parallel studies in the navy. Let us urge experimental trials, but let us begin by adopting the actual machine that we may profit immediately by the progress attained. Let us consider how the machine of to-day can be of service: We can have in the first place the “coast aeroplane,” which, rising from a point of departure in proximity to a port of war, could fly out to a great distance over the watei-(30 miles, for instance), and, mounting to a great height, from 1,500 to 4,500 feet, according to the clearness of the atmosphere, descry upon the distant horizon the presence of a hostile squadron or a fleet of torpedo boats. It could observe the number, strength, formation, and direction of the enemy, and in less than an hour and a half return with a report which would at present require the employment of two 0” three cruisers. or ten torpedo-boat destroyers, and two or three times as great a lapse of time. Then there is the search for submarines or mines placed by the enemy in - the channels of safe exit from ports. The recent experiments of the aviator Au-brun at Cherbourg have shown that from a height it is possible to see a considerable depth down into the water. The “aeroplane of the high seas” would be capable of a mission of larger extent and greater radius than the coast aeroplane. This is the machine belonging to a specially equipped convoy boat (not a man-of-war). The aeroplane rises from (Continued on jjaye 3&7.)

Scientific American Magazine Vol 105 Issue 18This article was published with the title “The Aeroplane in Naval Service” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 105 No. 18 (), p. 384
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican10281911-384a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe