The American Association for the Advancement of Science

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A great number of gentlemen, doctors, professors and savans, have spent six days in Baltimore for the purpose of giving to the world the results of their year's researches into the ever green fields of unexplored truth; but with a few exceptional facts, the world will be no wiser, and is not any better in an educational point of view, than it was a year ago. A city cotemporary in an article on this subject remarks that " the labors of this Association have for the last two or three years been of use to no one." Great practical questions of public health and social science have been shirked, and pettifoggying papers upon " the Phylotaxis deduced from the Mathematical Definition of Distribution," haveengross-ed the time and talent of the members ; the great lights of science are not so active as they used to be, and it is now chiefly in the hands of second-class men, who call each other unpleasant names, and stick to a theory as to their lives ; in fact, the Association seems to be going down. Some few interesting experiments were detailed, as for example Mr. A. B. Engstrom stated that he had on one occasion taken a small bell, and rowed out half a mile from the shore, and there submerged the bell to a depth of four inches. Upon its being struck it was distinctly heard upon the shore, thus proving a well known fact, that water is a good conductor of sound. Prof. Walcott Gibbs gave some interesting results of analysis, which had, however, no practical bearing, and Prof. Henry was ever ready with his vast fund of information upon all topics. Beyond this the newspaper reports are filled with professors' names and capital letters, indicating the titles of their owners, and so anxious are quasi scientific men for these distinctions that it is proposed to make some initial letters for the use of members of the Association, which we think might well be called " A Society for the Purpose of Encouraging Mutual Admiration." We are truly grieved to see that so little has been done by these gentlemen for the advancement of true science, that science of which they profess to be high priests, the spread of pure knowledge on all subjects among the great mass of the people, and we venture to give them a little advice, which, if they are wise they will take, not as coming alone from us, but as the expression of a large community who truly wish " American ScU ence " to take no second place in the history of the world. The advice is this :—Gentlemen, ignore as far as possible hard words ; bring your grand ideas into simple language, and follow the example of Cuvier, Linnseus, Humboldt, Franklin ; search for facts, not theories ; give to the world new truths alone, for depend upon it, every man can speculate enough for himself; whatever you discover, try also and find some practical use for it, (orpractical science is the demand of the age. Do this, and the meeting in'1859, at Springfield, Mass., will be the most successful you have yet had; if not, we much question whether the newspapers will report your august proceedings at all.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 36This article was published with the title “The American Association for the Advancement of Science” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 36 (), p. 285
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05151858-285b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe