The “Patent” Lobby in the Field—The Different Interests at Work, &c

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Washington correspondence of theNew York HeraUO The patent lobby is gradually coming in the field this session, though, so far, the india rubber interest has kept rather out of the way. Sam Colt, the pistol man, has rented a house here, and made application for a revival of his expired patent. His prospects in that connection are not brilliant; for whilst many members do not object to voting for the extension of an existing patent where a plausible cause can be shown, there are several of them who regard the revival of an expired patent as a different matter. They consider that when a patent has expired, the right to it becomes vested in the public, and that Congress has no constitutional right to deprive the public of this acquired right. But in Colt's case it is hard to understand what solid pretence he can set up for a revival of his monopoly. As he was a poor man when he commenced, is now wealthy, and has made all his money out of his patent, he cannot seriously pretend that he has not had that reasonable reward for his invention which is all the principle which the patent law contemplates. Tho shorter the time a pateut monopoly exists, consistent with a due reward for the inventor, the better for the public and the progress of inventions. To extend them for an unreasonable period, is to stop, during that time, all'improvements in the particular article, except what the original inventor chooses to adopt. Col. Colt has made good contracts with the English, French, Russian and American governments, and he is scarcely an object for the eleemosynary regard of Congress. McCormick, the reaper patentee, is also here, trying to get, not an extension of his present patent, but a revival of the first patent he took out, for a crude machine which he never made work. He improved on this crude principle, and has a patent for his improv-ment. But what he seeks is a revival of the patent on his first crudity, so as to prevent any other person from making improvements on it, as it might interfere with his present monopoly. He has plenty of money to prosecute his matter, but so far he has had but meager success, either at the Patent Office or in Congress. He has been trying to get a bill passed for several years, and is here again to resume his labors. The india rubber interest consists of the Chaffee patent, the Hayward patent, Horace F. Day's claims, and the Goodyear patent. The Chaffee and the Hayward patents have expired, and their renewal is sought. They are both for preliminary processes in the manufacture of the vulcanized rubber, and either of them, if revived, would control the Goodyear patent. The Goodyear patent expires next June, and the Commissioner of Patents will then decide whether he will extend it for six years or not. This interest is one of the wealthiest in the country ; and the profits, if either Hayward's patent or Goodyear's is extended, are computed as high as fifty million dollars. There was a large lobby here last year in the india rubber interest, and I see some of the managers again on the ground.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 21This article was published with the title “The “Patent”Lobby in the Field.—The Different Interests at Work, &c” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 21 (), p. 166
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01301858-166

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe