The Atlantic Telegraph Cable—Its Faulty Construction

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A correspondent—Wm. H. Danforth—writing to us from Salem, Mass., gives it as his opinion that the construction of the Atlantic telegraph cable is faulty, and that it is liable to failure independent of the best paying-out machinery that may be employai. He asserts that as the inside or conducting copper wire? of it are small and laid parallel, while the outside protecting iron wires are twisted and laid on the top of a soft material, that when subjected to great strain, the latter wires will attenuate, and reduce the .thickness of the cable, thus causing such a tensile strain to be exerted upon tlie inside small wires as to rupture them, because they cannot elongate in the same proportion as the twisted outside wires. If such a result should occur, the cable might be laid, and yet fail to operate in conducting messages, because of the inside or conducting wires being ruptured while the outside wires remained intact. Mr. D. asserts that the inside strands should be of sufficient strength to withstand all the strain that may be brought upon the cable. Perhaps it was owing to the drawing out of the inside strands of the cable, during the former attempt to lay it, that the electrical current became feebler and feebler, as stated by Professor Morso, while the cable was being run out rapidly in deep water.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 24This article was published with the title “The Atlantic Telegraph Cable—Its Faulty Construction” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 24 (), p. 185
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican02201858-185d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe