The Battleship "Orion"

The First British Super-Dreadnought

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


THERE are many points of interest to be noted in connection with the completion of the British battleship “Orion,” which, having completed her trials, is now being preparei for commission. In the first place, the “Orion” is the first completed vessel to mount the new 13.5-inch 76-ton gun. Secondly, she is the first British ship of the all-big-gun type to carry her five turrets on the middle line. Thirdly, she is the first British armored ship to exceed a tonnage of 20,000. The figure has been reached and closely approached before. Thus, the “Neptune” displaces 19,906, and the “Hercules” and “Colossus” 20,000 tons. The tonnage of the “Orion” is, however, 22,500, which is still slightly below the displacement of the German battleships “Helgoland,” “Thuringen,” and “Ost- friesland,” now in service with the High Sea Fleet. The “Orion” left for her preliminary trials on September 11th, twenty-one and a half months from the laying of the first keel-plate. No single detail of the vessel has been officially published, but the following are her principal dimensions: Length (between perpendiculars), 545 feet; length over all, 584 feet; beam, 88 feet 6 inches; mean draft, 27 feet 6 inches. The machinery is of the Parsons turbine type, the designed horse-power being 27,000 for 21 'mots. On the full speed trial the contract speed was exceeded by a knot. It is interesting in this connection to note that of the eleven completed British dreadnoughts only two have failed to make 22 knots, namely, the “St.Vin.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 105 Issue 20This article was published with the title “The Battleship “Orion'” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 105 No. 20 (), p. 431
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11111911-431

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe