Courtesy of Thomas Hartung and David Pamies Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing and Organome, LLC, and Paula Barreras and Carlos Pardo Division of Neuroimmunology and Neurological Infections, Johns Hopkins Hospital
Join Our Community of Science Lovers!
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Lab-grown miniature brains are poised to shake up drug testing for everything from Alzheimer’s disease to Zika. Each bundle of human brain cells is so tiny that it could fit on the head of a pin. Researcher Thomas Hartung and his colleagues at Johns Hopkins University created these mini brains using stem cells that, over the course of two months, morph into supporting cells and various types of neurons, which quickly connect to one another and start communicating.
These three micrographs were taken with lasers to illuminate colorful fluorescent dyes. The cells’ nuclei appear purple or blue. The mini brain on the right features a tangle of axons (pink)—extensions of neurons that send and receive signals. More axons (red) and neurons that produce the neurotransmitter dopamine (green) are highlighted in the middle brain. The left one shows nerve cell bodies and their projecting dendrites (both green), as well as supporting astrocytes (red).
The mini brains are highly uniform, freezer-proof and relatively cheap. Hartung’s start-up, Organome, plans to market them soon as a substitute for lab animals in drug testing. “We are moving into cell culture for the 21st century,” he says.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.