"The Blend," a Meat–Mushroom Amalgam, Hits Restaurants and School Cafeterias

The hybrid is healthier than all-beef dishes—and a more sustainable option, too

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One of the biggest scientific experiments in American schools this year has unfolded not in a petri dish but in a patty. Instead of all-beef burgers, students in more than 300 school districts across the country have been eating “The Blend,” a meat-mushroom amalgam.

This mash-up has its roots in a “healthy flavors” initiative from the Culinary Institute of America, which teamed up with the Mushroom Council in 2011 to explore how the umbrella-shaped fungi could trim the dietary sins of common beef dishes. The groups then partnered with Jean-Xavier Guinard, a sensory scientist at the University of California, Davis, who runs a flavor laboratory specializing in testing and characterizing food tastes. In 2014 The Blend was born.

Why use mushrooms as a stand-in for beef? They contain a chemical cocktail that yields a meaty taste called umami, Japanese for “delicious.” But in contrast to beef, mushrooms boast fewer calories, less sodium and no saturated fat. Those nutritional benefits have persuaded school districts, which must meet national health standards, to try the mixture. For instance, last fall school food provider Sodexo replaced its conventional burgers with versions containing 30 percent mushroom (the percentage counts as a full serving of vegetables). If Sodexo serves the same number of burgers this school year as it typically does, it projects students overall will consume a total of approximately 16 million grams less saturated fat and 300 million milligrams less sodium.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mushrooms also provide a green alternative to red meat. Their vendors have yet to quantify environmental impacts, but Kirk Broders, an assistant professor of bioagriculture at Colorado State University, sees promise. “It would be much more sustainable than livestock production,” he notes. Mushrooms require relatively few resources to flourish: commercially grown varieties thrive on manure and carbon-rich agricultural by-products such as corn husks. They also do not require the space and antibiotics that livestock do. Plus they reach maturity much faster.

Despite reports of successful replacements, The Blend does not work in all dishes. In one recent blind taste test, 147 participants sampled carne asada and taco-filling mixes featuring a range of beef and mushroom percentages. Although more than half of them preferred mushroom-mixed taco blends to pure-beef ones, many subjects gave low marks to a mushroom-laden carne asada for texture and appearance. “When you're eating carne asada, you're expecting strips of beef,” Guinard says. “In the taco blend, where the stuff is ground small, you really don't see it.”

If the burgers perform well in schools, however, they may soon debut in office cafeterias, too. National restaurant chains, including Pizza Hut and Seasons 52, have also quietly slipped blended entrées onto their menus in a quest for healthier offerings. All that means The Blend could be the burger of the future. That is, until lab-grown patties come along.

Natalie Jacewicz is a journalist in the science communication program at the University of California, Santa Cruz. She holds a bachelor's degree in evolutionary biology from Harvard. For more of her work, visit http://nataliejacewicz.com/

More by Natalie Jacewicz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 4This article was published with the title “A Twist on the Mushroom Burger” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 4 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0416-16

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe