The Brain Cells behind a Sense of Direction

Goal-direction cells add to Nobel Prize–winning discoveries to reveal our internal navigation system

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

After wandering around an unfamiliar part of town, can you sense which direction to travel to get back to the subway or your car? If so, you can thank your entorhinal cortex, a brain area recently identified as being responsible for our sense of direction. Variation in the signals in this area might even explain why some people are better navigators than others.

The new work adds to a growing understanding of how our brain knows where we are. Groundbreaking discoveries in this field won last year's Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for John O'Keefe, a neuroscientist at University College London, who discovered “place cells” in the hippocampus, a brain region most associated with memory. These cells activate when we move into a specific location, so that groups of them form a map of the environment.

O'Keefe shared the prize with his former students Edvard Moser and May-Britt Moser, both now at the Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience in Norway, who discovered “grid cells” in the entorhinal cortex, a region adjacent to the hippocampus. Grid cells have been called the brain's GPS system. They are thought to tell us where we are relative to where we started.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A third type—head-direction cells, also found in the entorhinal region—fires when we face a certain direction (such as “toward the mountain”). Together these specialized neurons appear to enable navigation, but precisely how is still unclear. For instance, in addition to knowing which direction we are facing, we need to know which direction to travel. Little was known about how or where such a goal-direction signal might be generated in the brain until the new study.

A team of researchers, led by Hugo Spiers of University College London, asked 16 volunteers to familiarize themselves with a virtual environment consisting of a square courtyard with a landscape (such as a forest or a mountain) on each wall and a unique object in each corner. They then scanned the participants' brains while showing them views from the environment and asking them to indicate in which direction different objects lay.

The entorhinal region displayed a distinct pattern of activity when volunteers faced each direction—consistent with how head-direction cells should behave. The researchers discovered, however, that the same pattern appeared whether the volunteers were facing a specific direction or just thinking about it. The finding suggests that the same mechanism that signals head direction also simulates goal direction. How, exactly, the brain switches back and forth is unclear, but the researchers think the brain probably signals which direction you are facing until you consciously decide to think about where you want to go, at which point the same cells then run the simulation.

Interestingly, the more consistent the participants' goal-direction signals were, the better they were able to correctly recall in which direction the target objects lay, potentially offering a brain-based explanation for differences in navigational ability. Such results should be interpreted carefully, however. “There are many ways worse performance can lead to weaker effects,” cautions Neil Burgess, who heads a different group studying these systems at University College London. For instance, if a participant's attention lapses, she or he will not only perform worse but also produce less relevant brain activity.

The work may have clinical relevance. The ability to navigate is often an early casualty of dementias such as Alzheimer's disease because the entorhinal region is one of the first areas to be affected. Spiers's group is working with doctors to develop tests to help identify deficits and potentially measure disease progression.

Simon Makin is a freelance science journalist based in the U.K. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Economist, Scientific American and Nature, among others. He covers the life sciences and specializes in neuroscience, psychology and mental health. Follow Makin on X (formerly Twitter) @SimonMakin

More by Simon Makin
SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 3This article was published with the title “The brain's homing signal” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 3 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0515-12

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe