The Breech-Loading Rifles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Secretary of War has decided that the report of the Board for the trial of breech-loading rifles at West Point is not conclusive in favor of any one of them as a standard government gun ; nevertheless he proposed to give Geneml Burnside a contract for 1,000 of his rifles at the liberal price of $40 each. This would cover one half of the " Breech-loading Rifle Fund," the remainder to be distributed among the other competitors in the order of merit reported by the Official Board. General Burnside declines the contract, and the whole sum, between $70,000 ond $80,000, will now be equitably divided in contracts among those of the competing inventors whose rifles seem best adapted to government service. Our readers will find the report referred to in No. 7 of our present volume.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 11This article was published with the title “The Breech-Loading Rifles” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 11 (), p. 81
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11211857-81c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe