The Burning Coal Mountain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That portion of the Broad Mountain, called the “Fiery Mountains,” from the fact of the anthracite coal at "that point being on fire— which has been burning for the last fifteen years, is situated about five miles from Mi-nersville and fifteen, from Schuylkill Haven. It is now considered a very dangerous expe riment to travel over the mountain, as it is supposed that in many places the surface is a mere superficial crust or shell, the coal having been consumed up to the surface, and hence the least pressure thereon, it is presumed, might break through and let the adventurer down into the fiery chasm below. At the base of the mountain, in one place, a stream of water almost boiling hot, comes out. The surface of the mountain presents a desolate I appearance as far as the eye can reach. The mountain is either cracked, burned or broken into enormous and fearful depths by the ap proach of the fires to the upper stratum; roots and trunks of the lofty trees are charred and blackened, mingling their pyroligneous odor with the sulphurous vaporsfrom the hot caves and crevices around. The calcinpd bones of birds, reptiles, and small quadrupeds, lie fiere and there, half mixed with'the mineral ashes, to fill up the blasted view, while amidst the ', vast scene of desolation may be seen a solita ry wood-flower, springing from this perpetual " hot-bed," and presenting, in the uncongenial atmosphere, a mockery of bloom.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 29This article was published with the title “The Burning Coal Mountain” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 29 (), p. 232
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04021853-232d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe