The ‘Confetti Illusion’ Makes Fruit Appear Riper Than It Really Is

Fruit seems riper when it is wrapped in a net that matches its optimal color, such as a really orangey orange

Clementines in an orange net.

Fruits such as these clementines look riper and more appetizing when they are offered in a colored net.

Karimala/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In the supermarket you inspect oranges in a net bag. They look ripe and appetizing. Then, when you get home, you are shocked: they’re still green! This is caused by a perceptual phenomenon known as color assimilation or the confetti illusion: objects appear to take on the color of a pattern placed over them. The product sells better when it’s in a net that’s the color of specimens of perfect ripeness. What is already well known in the fruit-and-vegetable trade now has a scientific basis. (Of course, Citrus Red No. 2 dye can also make green oranges appear ripe. But undyed fruit, such as organic produce, can still be spiffed up with the confetti illusion.)

Karl Gegenfurtner, a perception psychologist at Justus Liebig University Giessen [AS1] in Germany, has has shown how this illusion works in fruit in in a short paper in the journal i-Perception. A perceptual illusion is generally understood to be an incorrect interpretation of sensory stimuli. The phenomenon is based on the fact that stimuli always represent incomplete information, which is only combined with your experiences to put together a sensory impression. This can lead to errors.

Gegenfurtner himself had previously found that oranges he had bought were not actually as ripe as they appeared to be through the net. After the initial disappointment, the color researcher’s interest was aroused. To rule out the possibility that the observed effect was caused only by reflections between the net and the fruit, he graphically re-created the net as a striped pattern and placed a photograph of a greenish, shimmering, unripe orange behind it. Lo and behold the piece of fruit suddenly appeared noticeably darker.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“These findings highlight the significant implications of color assimilation in everyday consumer environments, offering a fresh perspective on how visual perception can be manipulated,” Gegenfurtner wrote in his study. “Looking around in typical supermarkets, it is easy to see that fruits and vegetables (e.g., lemons, onions, zucchini, or even potatoes) are typically packaged in nets that are of the color of perfect exemplars.” Light reflections between the net and the fruit may even increase the color saturation.

To show how powerful the optical phenomenon can be in his paper, Gegenfurtner also demonstrated the confetti illusion with the faces of the three founders of trichromatic color theory: Hermann von Helmholtz, James Clerk Maxwell and Thomas Young. The effect is astonishing: The faces change hue depending on the colors of the striped pattern. And in a black-and-white version of the demonstration, the faces become very dark or very light. The illusion provides “a big chuckle for the color scientist, a sad moment for the consumer!” Gegenfurtner concluded.

This article originally appeared in Spektrum der Wissenschaft and was reproduced with permission.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe