New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Cosmic Dawn of Technology

Earth may well be a latecomer to the fraternity of technological civilizations

We are late bloomers, cosmologically speaking. The first stars formed as early as a tenth of a billion years after the big bang. The sun formed 9.1 billion years later, merely 4.6 billion years ago, when the universe already matured to two thirds of its current age. The late birth of the sun marked the tail end of the star formation history of the universe.

At present, the Earth-sun system is a common occurrence. Based on the planet candidate catalog compiled from the Kepler space telescope data, we know that on the order of half of all sunlike stars host an Earth-size planet in their habitable zone. These planets could accommodate ponds of liquid water on their surface and exhibit the chemistry of life. If this was also true near stars formed at earlier cosmic times, life may have started in our universe long before the sun was born. And consequently, the first technological civilizations may have sprung into existence billions of years ago. Given that our technologies advance exponentially on a timescale of a few years, the signals that may result from billions of years of technological development are unimaginable.

Even if there is only one species like ours in a large galaxy like our Milky Way, and this civilization transmits signals for just one century—as we already have—there should still be of order a hundred active civilizations on the sky at any given time. This follows from the fact that the observable volume of the universe contains about 10 billion such galaxies for 10 billion years. Can we detect artificial sources from cosmological distances and distinguish them from natural signals in the early universe?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An example of a distinct technological signal would be a spectral line with a puzzling radiation frequency that does not correspond to any known atomic or molecular transition. Such a signal would appear peculiar if it originates from a distant galaxy whose redshift is known based on identified emission or absorption lines originating from its stars or interstellar gas. An unidentified spectral line can be produced artificially by tunable lasers, like the free-electron lasers that our civilization developed to generate bright emission centered on a single frequency that could range from microwaves through terahertz radiation, to infrared, visible, ultraviolet or even x-rays.

The advantage of producing single-frequency radiation, as in a spectral line, is that it can be focused to the maximum possible level, the so-called diffraction limit, yielding the brightest beam for its power. The focused laser beam can be used, for example, to push a light sail to a high speed, as envisioned in the Starshot initiative. For propulsion purposes, the optimal frequency of the laser depends on the desired terminal speed and weight of the payload. For example, the optical-infrared band is ideal for reaching the speed of light with lightweight spacecrafts aimed at interstellar travel (e.g., from the sun to Alpha Centauri), whereas the radio band is best for reaching a thousandth of the speed of light, still 10 times faster than chemical rockets, with heavy crafts used for interplanetary transport of cargos (e.g., between the Earth and Mars).

The leakage of light from a powerful launch facility that harnesses all the starlight that is intercepted by a habitable Earth-size planet and focuses it into a diffraction-limited laser beam, can be detected across the entire universe. Since the source moves relative to us, the beam would sweep across our sky and appear like a flash of light from a lighthouse. The resulting optical flashes can be searched for with the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) on the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which is expected to start its scientific operation in late 2023.

The confusing background for cosmological signals would be transient flashes from reflected sunlight by our communication satellites, which might add up to constellations of tens of thousands of independent pieces filling our sky in the coming years. This technosignature of our own making might compromise our ability to search for cosmic flashes from Earth. An already known class of brief transients at cosmological distances are fast radio bursts, but these are thought to originate from highly magnetized neutron stars based on a known galactic source.

A civilization that harvests only the energy available on its planet was classified as Type I by Nikolai Kardashev in 1964. Types II and III civilizations on the Kardashev scale use the energy available to their planetary system and host galaxy, respectively. These advanced types are already constrained by available data since they are easier to notice. But the realm of possibilities extends beyond the levels first considered by Kardashev. In principle, it is possible to imagine hypothetical civilizations that harvest the energy available in their cluster of galaxies or their entire cosmological horizon. Of course, space and time do not end at the farthest reach of our telescopes. The possibilities might be even grander beyond our cosmic horizon and before the big bang.

Finding evidence for the cosmic dawn of technology will place our own existence and aspirations in a broader context. We wouldn’t have needed to invent the wheel if we saw it first spinning on our land under a rover manufactured by a more advanced species.

Currently, we have no clue for the sophistication level of the technologies that preceded us in the cosmos. But one thing is clear. If any of us would decipher an alien technology that represents a quantum leap relative to what we possess today, then that person will become extremely wealthy by marketing the same idea on Earth. The “gold rush” opportunity of mining the sky for new technological ideas offers a financial incentive for becoming an observational astronomer. In the long run, if—as many of us expect—we are not the smartest kids on the cosmic street, astronomy may offer prospects for more affluence than Silicon Valley or Wall Street.

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, founding director of Harvard University’s Black Hole Initiative, and the former chair of the Harvard astronomy department (2011-2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He has published more than a thousand peer-reviewed papers and is the bestselling author of Extraterrestrial and Interstellar and a co-author of the textbooks Life in the Cosmos and The First Galaxies in the Universe.

More by Avi Loeb

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe