The Delay in the Publication of the Patent Office Gazette and of Copies of Patents

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Patent Office Gazette, as published during recent years, has fairiy ranked as a model for the world. In its printing, illustrating,perfect and complete indexing and general character it has excelled both in typography and in clerical accuracy. When it is considered that each week the claims of some 500 patents had to be printed within its pages, with illustrations of very many of them, it will be seen that the work of doing this satisfactorily and up to date was no slight one. It is questionable if the government received better service from any of its contractors or employes than from those concerned in the publication of the Gazette. Incidental to its publication was the printing of half a million full copies of the patents of the week and the photolithographic reproduction of the drawings for them. The amount of the most difficult kind of supervision and proof reading involved in all this work was very great, and the expensive adequate plant for doing the mechanical work had to be supplemented by trained employes at high salaries. Recently, as our readers know, a change has taken place in the administration of the Patent Office, a new commissioner has been appointed, and for some reason the work of printing has been given to some other printer. Apparently this has been done without makingproper arrangements for satisfactorily doing the work on time. Consequently, we find the production of the Gazette, the production of the copies of patents and drawings, all are delayed, and complaints about the matter are pouring into the Patent OfQce from all quarters. This is not creditable to the new administration of the Patent OfBce, and we hope a remedy will be applied quickly. There is nothing to be said about the expediency of changing the printer, but there is a great deal to be said about the inexpediency of making the change before sure and adequate facilities had been provided for effectively keeping up the work.

SA Supplements Vol 36 Issue 916suppThis article was published with the title “Patents” in SA Supplements Vol. 36 No. 916supp (), p. 50
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07221893-14646bsupp

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe