New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

The Dreaded Middle Seat

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On commuter trains, the middle seat in a bank of three is always the last to be occupied. Some passengers will even stand for an hour by doorways rather than sit between patrons. Why? This quirky aversion may be a case of psychological security trumping physical comfort.

The tension often begins when greedy window- and aisle-seat occupants discourage access to the middle seat by blocking it with a briefcase or studiously avoiding eye contact with approaching seat searchers. Many passengers would sooner walk by than initiate a strained interaction.

And if a commuter does squeeze in, the trials continue. According to Richard E. Wener, an environmental psychologist at Polytechnic University in Brooklyn, unplanned encounters such as brushing an arm against a neighbor raise anxiety by marring one's sense of “predictability and control.” (For more on travel stress, see “Commuting Takes Its Toll,” on page 14.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The phobia has become so prevalent that as transit authorities from Washington, D.C., to Seattle update their fleets, they are commissioning cars containing only pairs of seats, even if that means more cars per train or that more commuters must stand. No one has really examined how to reduce the problem, but Wener offers one suggestion: armrests, like those on airplanes. “These help each traveler demarcate territory,” which fosters a perception of increased control, lessening stress.

SA Mind Vol 16 Issue 3This article was published with the title “The Dreaded Middle Seat” in SA Mind Vol. 16 No. 3 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1005-9b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe