The Dreaded Middle Seat

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On commuter trains, the middle seat in a bank of three is always the last to be occupied. Some passengers will even stand for an hour by doorways rather than sit between patrons. Why? This quirky aversion may be a case of psychological security trumping physical comfort.

The tension often begins when greedy window- and aisle-seat occupants discourage access to the middle seat by blocking it with a briefcase or studiously avoiding eye contact with approaching seat searchers. Many passengers would sooner walk by than initiate a strained interaction.

And if a commuter does squeeze in, the trials continue. According to Richard E. Wener, an environmental psychologist at Polytechnic University in Brooklyn, unplanned encounters such as brushing an arm against a neighbor raise anxiety by marring one's sense of “predictability and control.” (For more on travel stress, see “Commuting Takes Its Toll,” on page 14.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The phobia has become so prevalent that as transit authorities from Washington, D.C., to Seattle update their fleets, they are commissioning cars containing only pairs of seats, even if that means more cars per train or that more commuters must stand. No one has really examined how to reduce the problem, but Wener offers one suggestion: armrests, like those on airplanes. “These help each traveler demarcate territory,” which fosters a perception of increased control, lessening stress.

SA Mind Vol 16 Issue 3This article was published with the title “The Dreaded Middle Seat” in SA Mind Vol. 16 No. 3 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1005-9b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe