The Dry Canvas Problem

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Have you ever wondered whether you would get wetter if you ran through a rain storm rather than walked? At which angle should you incline your head to minimize the amount of water that hits you? This puzzle asks the same question, but concerns moving an object through the rain: a museum’s large, precious Delacroix canvas.

To start, assume your museum’s canvas is of height H and side-to-side width W. Raindrops fall vertically at velocity vr . It is raining steadily and heavily and you don't want the canvas to get wet.

Warm-Up: If the canvas is waterproof on its very top surface (and the water that hits the top will flow to the sides of the canvas without dripping on it) but the canvas is equally sensitive to water in the front and back, how fast and at which angle should you move the canvas so the front and back receive as little rain as possible?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Solution to Warm-Up: When the canvas moves with velocity vc no rain will fall on the front or back of the canvas if the canvas is tilted forward at an angle theta (from the vertical direction) where theta = arctan(vc / vr ) and vr is the velocity of the raindrops.

In case your trigonometry is rusty, recall that the tangent of a right triangle is the opposite length over the adjacent length. If a raindrop starts in front of the canvas it won't hit the canvas (the canvas will never catch up) and if it starts behind, it will never catch up to the canvas.

The curator finds the prospect of keeping a steady pace a little worrisome, so he manages to find an awning that can be attached to the top of the canvas.

Problems: 1. If there is an awning of length A attached at right angles to the top of the canvas of height H, and if both the canvas and the rain are vertical,then how fast should you move to ensure that no rain hits the front or back of the canvas and you arrive to the destination as quickly as possible?

This strategy doesn't work well if there is a head wind, especially a variable wind. In that case, you may want to tilt the canvas and swivel the awning in surprising ways.

2. Suppose that the awning can be swiveled to any position relative to the canvas. The head wind  vw varies from 0 to 1.5 meters per second. The vertical velocity of the raindrops vr is 5 meters per second, the height H of the canvas is 3 meters, and the awning A is 0.8 meters off the canvas. With which velocity vc must you move? At which angle should the canvas be to the ground? At which angle should the awning be to the canvas? Does it help to move faster?

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe