The Egg-Shaped Vertical Boiler

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Having presented a great number of engravings of boilers in our last volume, and also a great amount of information on this very important subject, we present the following engravings of the "egg-shaped boil- er," much used in some parts of England. A description and diagram appeared in a communication in the last number of the " London Artisan," by Robert Armstrong, the author of the best work ever published on .steam boilers. This boiler is well adapted to be worked by the waste heat of puddling furnaces in iron works, and for this purpose it was originally contrived. Two boilers of this description, 9 feet in diameter and 18 feet high, in an iron works at Wolverhampton, England, made steam sufficient to work an engine of 80 horse power from the spare heat proceeding from four puddling furnaces—two furnaces to each boiler. Figure 1 is a vertical section, and figure 2 a plan view. The arrows show how the heated gases are admitted by the flues, a bed, from the puddling furnaces. These meet at the centre, and pass down and out through the vertical flue, the greatest heat being-applied nearest to thesunace of the water, the correct principle. Having presented a new puddling furnace in the last number of the Scientific American, and having stated in describing it, that it was especially adapted for using waste heat for raising steam to work the engines, this boiler will iorm a useful accompaniment to the same.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 50This article was published with the title “The Egg-Shaped Vertical Boiler” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 50 (), p. 400
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08271853-400b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe