The Electric Railway Street Sprinkler

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mr. L. W. Campbell is the inventor and patentee of a new design in railway street sprinklers. The accompanying illustration shows its appearance when in use. It is a combined track and street sprinkler, and the first effort with in our knowledge to combine the two ideas. It is so constructed that it will, at the pleasure of the motorman, sprinl{le a single or double track alone, omitting the sides, or it will sprinkle one or both sides, including the track, if desired. It will sprinkle a street of any reasonable width, say a street so narrow as to barely allow the car to pass, to a street one hundred feet wide, without any change in the structure of the machine. The Car says the Rapid Transit Street Sprinkler Company, of Waco, Tex., are the makers. -llll '''Ily PI'opellel' Shafts HIeak. It is getting to be pretty well understood that the frequent hreaking of propeller shafts is not due to the defective material of the shafts themselves so much as to the excessive strains to which they are subjected, owing to the working and straining of the hull of the ship in a seaway. The Railway Engineering and Mechanic states that careful measllrements taken on a steamer in heavy weather showed that the propeller shaft was at times sprung out of line 1M inches in a length of 112 feet. Measurements on deck showed the same amount of deflection. 'fhe ship was stiffened, and the shafting gave no further trouble.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 73 Issue 25This article was published with the title “The Electric Railway Street Sprinkler” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 73 No. 25 (), p. 394
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12211895-394

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe