New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Evolutionary Origins of Schizophrenia

The massive human brain enables language—and psychosis

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Brains today are expensive—metabolically speaking, that is. Pound for pound, the human brain demands a huge amount of energy to support its recently evolved language and social skills. Now a study offers some of the first strong evidence that the rapid development of our metabolically costly brain may have led to an unfortunate by-product: when energy prob­lems arise, the result may be schizophrenia.

No one knows exactly what causes schizo­phrenia, a debilitating disorder characterized by psychosis and severe cognitive impairments. One theory, which suggests it is a consequence of our brain’s high metabolism, has been around for years—but until now scientists had not devel­oped a way to test it.

In the new study—a rare combination of evolutionary genetics and med­icine—research­ers in China, Germany and the U.K. compared gene expres­sion (when and where in the body certain genes are active) and concen­trations of meta­bolites (small molecules crucial for metabolic processes) in the post­mortem brains of people without schizophrenia with those in the brains of chimpan­zees, rhesus macaques and human schizo­phrenics. They determined that the genes and metabolites that are altered in schizo­phrenia appear to have changed rapidly in recent human evolution. More important, they are related to energy metabolism.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because these changes may have happened recently (on an evolutionary scale), we may not yet have developed ways to cope with energy problems that arise, according to study co-author Philipp Khaitovich, an evolutionary biologist at the joint Max Planck/Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute for Compu­tational Biology in Shanghai. Khaitovich suggests that the brain could be operating at the limit of its energy-regulating abilities, so it might be easy for something to go wrong, as in the case of schizophrenia.

This study may begin to explain why schizophrenia exists but not necessarily why some people are more predisposed to it than others, says Matthew Keller, an evolutionary behavioral geneticist at the University of Colorado at Boulder, who was not involved with the study.

Khaitovich agrees that the work is just a glimpse into the mechanisms responsible for our uniquely human abilities, but the findings do put metabolism in the spotlight for future research. Once we understand what makes our brains special, we can begin to understand what goes wrong in schizophrenia, he says.

Note: This article was originally published with the title, "Schizophrenia's Roots".

SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Schizophrenia's Roots” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 6 (), p. 6
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1208-6

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe