The Existence of Bodies Smaller than Atoms--The Corpuscular Hypothesis

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If Prof. J. J. Thomson's corpuscular hypothesis be absolutely demonstrated, our ideas in regard to chemistry will be revolutionized. In a recent lecture before the Royal Institution he selected as his subject "The Existence of Bodies Smaller than Atoms." He briefly referred to work which had been done by others in theory and practice, in order to determine the size of an atom. One method of doing this was by ascertaining the charge of electricity which an atom carried during the process of electrolysis, and from the charge to calculate the mass. The experiments of the lecturer were made with the view of ascertaining the mass of small particles which carry an electric discharge through attenuated gases. The next experiment was made with the object of ascertaining the mass of all the particles used to carry the charge and also their number. For this purpose some of the experiments of Mr. Wilson on the sudden expansion of a gas saturated with moisture were used. He found that a cloud was not produced by the sudden expansion if the air was quite free from dust. It was also found that if either the dust or the charged particles ot" gas were present a cloud was formed. The total quantity of moisture in the cloud can be calculated from the expansion. Some experiments of Prof. George Stokes were then employed to ascertain the volume of each particle. These experiments had for their end the careful determination of the rate at which particles of water would fall, the speed being dependent upon the dimensions. From the formula which Prof. Thomson obtained, he was able to ascertain the size of the particles by observing the time it took for the cloud formed in the tube by a sudden expansion to fall. Once he knew the size of one particle and the total mass, it was not difficult to make calculations. He concluded that the small particles carrying the charges of electricity were only one-thousandth of the size of an atom. These experiments were all made with discharges pf negative electricity. It was also found that these small particles negatively chrged were given off from incandescent matter and from radium. Prof. Thomson expressed mathematically the laws of Becquerel and cathode rays and then showed from his equations that the rays possessed momentum and, therefore, must have mass. When he first enumerated his theory to the scientific world three or four years ago, it was received with considerable incredulity, but has now been adopted by many scientists. He regards the chemical atom as made up of a large number of similar bodies which he calls "corpuscles." A normal atom forms a system which is electrically neutral. The electrification of a gas consists in the breaking off from the atoms of a few corpuscles. The remainder of the atom is positively electrified, and the more corpuscles that are broken off the stronger is the attraction that binds the remainder to the atom. Prof. Thomson has calculated from the results of his experiments on very different substances that the mass of a negative corpuscle is about the five-hundredth part of the hydrogen atom. The subject is treated at considerable length in the current issue of our SUPPLEMENT.

SA Supplements Vol 51 Issue 1324suppThis article was published with the title “The Corpuscular Hypothesis” in SA Supplements Vol. 51 No. 1324supp (), p. 306
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05181901-21228asupp

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe