The Future of Fish Farming

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: From Northwest Fisheries Science Center

With up to 70 percent of the world¿s fisheries threatened by overfishing, aquaculture is going to have to cast its net a lot farther. Indeed, according to a keynote address delivered on Saturday at the International Marine Biotechnology Conference in Townsville, Australia, aquaculture will need to triple or quadruple output by the year 2025 in order to meet the anticipated rise in demand for seafood. To that end, says Yonathan Zohar of the University of Maryland, biotechnology is playing an increasingly important role.

One noteworthy area of research concerns the filtering and monitoring of water conditions in tanks for growing fish. Currently most aquaculture takes place in ponds or netpens in open water. Thirty years from now, however, such farming will have to be contained, Zohar remarks. With the closed system approach, aquaculturists will avoid worrisome things like wastewater and the escape of genetically modified or non-native species. Moreover, closed systems enable optimization of growing conditions, which enhances the growth rates and overall health of the fish. He further notes that genetic engineering will produce fish that grow faster and convert feed to meat more efficiently. In Zohar's mind, such advances are a long time coming. "Seafood is the only commodity that is still at the stage of hunt-and-gather farming," he observes. "Compare it with chickens, and we are way behind the curve."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe