The Genetic Roots of Autism

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Many studies have traced the history of families with more than one autistic member, but few scientists have attempted to crack the code of sporadic autism —which arises unexpectedly in a formerly unaffected lineage and is more common than inherited autism. Now a group at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory believes it has found a distinct mechanism by which autism can strike sporadically.

Led by Jonathan Sebat and Michael Wigler, the team examined the entire genomes of more than 150 families with at least one autistic member. They scanned for new genetic mutations, comparing any findings with parental DNA to assure the variation was not inherited and therefore truly sporadic.

They found that sporadic autism sufferers had a higher incidence of copy number deletions —regions where segments of DNA had been spontaneously deleted —than healthy subjects or people who inherited autism.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers estimate that these random DNA deletions, ranging from one to 69 genes in size, most likely contribute to mental illness in at least 15 percent of all autism patients. That proportion could rise as developing technology allows the group to find previously undetectable genetic alterations.

Now that these large-scale mutations have been identified, the Cold Spring Harbor group and other researchers can begin investigating individual genes within the target region.

Having already used this method to pinpoint cancer genes, the team is currently turning its eye to schizophrenia. Ultimately, the findings may elucidate how these afflictions arise and provide early detection tools so that treatment can begin sooner and be more effective.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe