The Grand Face of Public Architecture, 1867 [Slide Show]

Images from the Archive of Scientific American

The Public Ledger Building, Philadelphia. Opened in 1867, torn down in 1920 for a replacement that still stands. The building showed the power (and profit) of the press in a print era (the Ledger went bust in 1942).

Scientific American, July 27, 1867

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Public buildings have always been so much more than a utilitarian pile of building materials. Their design and construction self-consciously encompass the aspirational values of the builder, the user, and the society of which it is part. Technology-driven utility may be at the heart of these structures, but their final form is an artistic expression of a desire to awe, inspire, ennoble or educate. We may look back and think of them as quaint or amusing or beautiful, but in 1867 these edifices filled the same needs as their counterparts of the early 21st century.

Dan Schlenoff was a contributing editor at Scientific American and edited the 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago column for one seventh of the magazine's history.

More by Dan Schlenoff
Scientific American Magazine Vol 316 Issue 2This article was published with the title “The Grand Face of Public Architecture, 1867 [Slide Show]” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 316 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022017-qHco0BSbU43SpgRGn6bXX

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe