The Harvest Moon

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

THE term “harvest moon,” originating in England, where the brilliant moon-light of several consecutive evenings aided the harvesting of crops, is the popular expression for the moon at its full in the month of September in northern latitudes. This phenomenon of early moon-rise is dependent upon the degree of retardation of the moon's rising, as affected by difference in latitude. As conditions in England are especially favorable, full moon-rise at harvest time therefore occurs earlier than in the lower latitudes of this country. Following out this law of retardation, it is a matter of course to look for a yet earlier rising of the “harvest moon” in the far north of the Scandinavian peninsula; and an extremely opposite condition in the corresponding latitudes of the Southern hemisphere, where the “harvest moon” (if it were possible to use the term in this region) would occur about the time of the vernal instead of the autumnal equinox. Variations in the retardation of the moon's rising (a retardation which averages about 51 minutes daily) are due to complex conditions. If the earth's axis were perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic, and if the earth and moon revolved in circular orbits at uniform velocities around their respective centers of motion in that plane, the retardation would obviously be constant. But the earth's axis is inclined at an (Continued on page SO..)

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American