New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

The History of the Observable Universe

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article is a supplement to the feature "The Cosmic Origin of Time Arrow: Does Time Run Backward in Other Universes?" from the June 2008 issue of Scientific American.

Here is a timeline of important events in the history of our observable universe, according to conventional cosmology:

  • Space is empty, featuring nothing but a tiny amount of vacuum energy and an occasional long-wavelength particle formed via fluctuations of the quantum fields that suffuse space.

  • High-intensity radiation suddenly sweeps in from across the universe, in a spherical pattern focused on a point in space. When the radiation collects at that point, a “white hole” is formed.

  • The white hole gradually grows to billions of times the mass of the sun, through accretion of additional radiation of ever decreasing temperature.

  • Other white holes begin to approach from billions of light-years away. They form a homogeneous distribution, all slowly moving toward one another.

  • The white holes begin to lose mass by ejecting gas, dust and radiation into the surrounding environment.

  • The gas and dust occasionally implode to form stars, which spread themselves into galaxies surrounding the white holes.

  • Like the white holes before them, these stars receive inwardly directed radiation. They use the energy from this radiation to convert heavy elements into lighter ones.

  • Stars disperse into gas, which gradually smooths itself out through space; matter as a whole continues to move together and grow more dense.

  • The universe becomes ever hotter and denser, eventually contracting all the way to a big crunch.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Needless to say, this is not the usual way in which we describe the history of the universe—it is the conventional sequence of events told backward in time. But the laws of physics work equally well run forward or backward in time. Thus, this sequence is as legitimate as the usual one. It serves the purpose of driving home just how unlikely the entire history of our observable universe really is.

—S.M.C.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe