The Illusion of Mind

Victor Tongdee Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It may be one of the greatest scientific mysteries yet to be solved: What is consciousness? It’s an explanatory gap that still plagues neuroscientists—that is, what forges the relationship between the brain and the subjective sensations we call “feelings” or “awareness?” In a special report in this issue, we include several fresh takes on what gives humans, at the very least, consciousness. In one article, Peter Carruthers sits down with editor Steve Ayan to explain his hypothesis that consciousness is mostly an illusion (see “There Is No Such Thing as Conscious Thought”); the thoughts and feelings that arise in your mind are a result of unconscious mental processes operating behind the scenes. You feel you know your own mind, but it’s truly operating automatically. Dare I say the mind has a mind of its own?

Ayan further explores this idea in his article “The Brain’s Autopilot Mechanism Steers Consciousness.” Consciousness is only an impression of immediacy, he writes. We become aware of our consciousness when the brain’s background activities and predictions conflict with reality. Another fun idea that has come together in the past decade is that synchronized vibrations among living creatures are at the heart of human consciousness. Read more in Tam Hunt’s article “The Hippies Were Right! It’s All about Vibrations, Man!” As always, I hope you enjoy this issue, as much as your conscious mind allows.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Mind Vol 30 Issue 2This article was published with the title “The Illusion of Mind” in SA Mind Vol. 30 No. 2 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0319-2

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe