New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Illusion of Mind

Victor Tongdee Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It may be one of the greatest scientific mysteries yet to be solved: What is consciousness? It’s an explanatory gap that still plagues neuroscientists—that is, what forges the relationship between the brain and the subjective sensations we call “feelings” or “awareness?” In a special report in this issue, we include several fresh takes on what gives humans, at the very least, consciousness. In one article, Peter Carruthers sits down with editor Steve Ayan to explain his hypothesis that consciousness is mostly an illusion (see “There Is No Such Thing as Conscious Thought”); the thoughts and feelings that arise in your mind are a result of unconscious mental processes operating behind the scenes. You feel you know your own mind, but it’s truly operating automatically. Dare I say the mind has a mind of its own?

Ayan further explores this idea in his article “The Brain’s Autopilot Mechanism Steers Consciousness.” Consciousness is only an impression of immediacy, he writes. We become aware of our consciousness when the brain’s background activities and predictions conflict with reality. Another fun idea that has come together in the past decade is that synchronized vibrations among living creatures are at the heart of human consciousness. Read more in Tam Hunt’s article “The Hippies Were Right! It’s All about Vibrations, Man!” As always, I hope you enjoy this issue, as much as your conscious mind allows.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Mind Vol 30 Issue 2This article was published with the title “The Illusion of Mind” in SA Mind Vol. 30 No. 2 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0319-2

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe