The Infected Ship

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Two suggestions for the disinfecting of the Susquehanna have come to us from Missouri. One is to whitewash the whole vessel after the application of chlorine ; and the other is to burn charcoal in small braziers up and down the ship, it being closed up. This would convert all the air in the ship to carbonic acid and free nitrogen, which, our correspondent thinks, would kill the naalaria. A Michigan friend suggests that the inside planking should be taken out, and lime slacked between her bulkheads. He is also desirous of obtaining a contract for performing this operation. Sewing Machine Controversy.—^Wehave received a note from Geo. H. Wooster in reference to the sewing machine controversy noticed in our last week's paper. He declares that Watson's claim to priority on the " roughened surface and spring pressure feed" has not been abandoned, that an appeal has been taken from the Examiner's decision, and that the question of priority will be fought out to the bitter end. We beseech all the parties to this quarrel to conduct it as peaceably as possible, and not to forget the good old-fashioned advice applied to children not to "let their angry passions rise." Rejected Cases.—Inventors having rejected cases in the Patent Office, and not satisfied to abandon their claims, will find it greatly to their advantage to correspond with Munn & Co. Such cases receive their prompt and particular care. We are indebted to Hon. J. W. Sherman, 1 Hon. John Cochrane, and Hon. W. H. Seward ^ for Congressional documents.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 40This article was published with the title “The Infected Ship” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 40 (), p. 317
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican06121858-317e

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe