New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Inherent Gender of Names

A name’s sound can convey masculine or feminine traits

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One of language's great strengths is its flexibility—words can mean anything we want them to. But not all vocabulary is arbitrary. And according to a paper published in April in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, certain types of names are more likely to be given to boys versus girls, based merely on properties of their sound.

For decades researchers have discussed the role of sound symbolism, in which the sound of a word carries meaning regardless of its definition. The most famous example is the bouba/kiki effect: people across cultures and ages associate the made-up word bouba with round objects and kiki with spiky ones. As another example, the open volume in the mouth when pronouncing vowels expresses size; think of how big an event is evoked by splosh versus splish. To explore sound symbolism, Michael Slepian, the new paper's lead author and a researcher at Columbia Business School, says he wanted to “look to a place where people give new names to things all the time: other people.” He and his collaborator at Columbia, Adam Galinsky, also wondered if sounds could convey social information.

In one study, the researchers analyzed 270 million recorded baby names in the U.S. from 1937 to 2013. They found that boys were more likely than girls to receive names beginning with “hard” (voiced) phonemes, which vibrate the vocal cords, such as the A in Adam and the B in Brian. Names starting with “soft” (unvoiced) phonemes, such as the F in Fiona or the H in Heather, were more often assigned to girls than to boys.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In several online experiments, the researchers also showed that people in both the U.S. and India perceived voiced names—whether real or invented, boys' names or girls'—as “harder” than unvoiced ones and thus more masculine. The sound-gender association was strongest in those who most highly endorsed the stereotype of men as tough and women as tender.

Slepian suggests that parents choosing baby names might use this information to play into gender norms—or to buck them.


The First Sound Matters

If a name's initial phoneme is “voiced,” meaning it vibrates the vocal cords, it tends to be judged as “harder” and more masculine. Unvoiced phonemes, formed purely with the tongue and lips, tend to be judged as “softer” and more feminine. Here are some typical—and atypical!—examples:

VOICED

UNVOICED

ADAM

CAROL

BARBARA

CHARLES

DAVID

FELICIA

EDWARD

HOPE

GREGORY

KATHARINE

GERALD

PATRICK

IAN

PHOEBE

JESSICA

QUEENIE

LUKE

SARAH

MICHAEL

SHARON

NICHOLAS

TINA

OWEN

THEO

ROBERT

 

ULYSSES

 

VINCENT

 

WILLIAM

 

YVETTE

 

ZACHARY

 


Mouth movements influence word meaning in other ways, too: Words that move from the throat to the lips, such as “gap” and “cab,” are more often associated with avoidance or pushing away. Words that move inward, however, such as “pick” and “big,” tend to suggest approachability.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe