New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

JWST May Have Seen the First Stars in the Universe

Although these findings from JWST are yet to be confirmed, they mark the closest astronomers have come to locating the universe’s most ancient stars

A full-color image of a large galaxy cluster. Some galaxies are warped by gravitational lensing.

Galaxy cluster MACS J0416.1-2403 (MACS0416) magnifies the light from more distant background galaxies through gravitational lensing.

NASA/ESA/CSA/STScI/J. Diego/Instituto de Física de Cantabria/J. D’Silva/University of Western Australia/A. Koekemoer/STScI/J. Summers/Arizona State University/R. Windhorst/Arizona State University/H. Yan/University of Missouri

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Astronomers studying a distant galaxy using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have found the best candidates yet for the universe’s first stars.

These so-called Population III stars arose shortly after the big bang and formed from the primordial hydrogen and helium that then pervaded the universe. Shining brilliantly but briefly, they would have ended their lives in explosive supernovas that forged and scattered heavier elements, enriching the cosmos with material for subsequent stellar generations. JWST was purpose-built to help astronomers find Population III stars, but that task has proved extremely difficult because of how far away in space and time these short-lived stars are from our present.

The latest candidates reside in a galaxy called LAP1-B, which is located more than 13 billion light-years away. A larger, intervening galaxy cluster that is closer to us acts as a giant magnifying lens for LAP1-B’s faint, distant light. Looking at that light, astronomers found clear evidence of helium in LAP1-B—but virtually no heavier elements, as would be expected from an early galaxy filled with Population III stars.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new finding is not a smoking gun, but this is “the closest we are yet” to finding the most ancient stars, says astronomer Jorryt Matthee of the Institute of Science and Technology in Austria, who was not involved with the work.

The team behind the new study, published in October in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, noted there is still uncertainty because LAP1-B’s apparent lack of heavier elements could be explained in other ways. For instance, JWST could have detected unusually pristine clouds of gas rather than actual Population III stars.

Deeper studies of LAP1-B could provide more clarity. The absence of any trace of oxygen in the galaxy, for example, would bolster the case that this galaxy truly contains some of the universe’s first stars. But, Matthee cautions, an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence—especially when viewing something so far away. “It is very difficult to prove that heavy metals are not there,” he says.

Editor’s Note (11/19/25): This article was edited after posting to correct the description of the larger, intervening galaxy cluster and Jorryt Matthee’s current affiliation.

Humberto Basilio is a Mexican science journalist covering policy, health, misconduct, archaeology and the environment. He is also a former news intern at Scientific American. His work has been published in the New York Times, National Geographic, Science, Nature, and more.

More by Humberto Basilio

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe