New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Key to Great Sax

Pro saxophonists contort their vocal tracts to climb the upper registers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Amateur saxophonists of the world have long been in awe of the piercing high notes jazz legend John Coltrane used to hit, wondering why they can't scale the same auditory heights. Now researchers say they have the answer: Unlike amateurs, pro sax players have learned to flex their vocal tracts in a special way to amplify the high notes.

A sax's sound comes from a flexible reed in the mouthpiece that controls the airflow and pressure through the instrument, setting up strong air vibrations or resonances if a player blows the right way. Musicians and scientists have debated the role of the player's vocal tract—the hollow from the mouth to the glottis (the space between the vocal cords). Some contended that saxophonists have to shape their vocal tracts with their tongues and jaws to create a matching resonance.

"It would make sense for the vocal tract to influence your overall sound, because sometimes just by listening to how somebody plays a line you can tell who it is," says acoustician Jer Ming Chen of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. But until now, he says, there has been no way to directly measure the acoustics of a vocal tract in mid-note without interfering with the player's sound.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To make a direct measurement, Chen and two of his colleagues in Sydney modified the mouthpiece of a tenor saxophone. They added a device that would emit a combination of 224 tones into the vocal tract of the player, simultaneously recording the intensities of the tones as they bounced back into the mouthpiece, from which they could deduce the vibrations in the tract.

The team recorded five professional and three amateur saxophonists as each played a scale on the modified sax. All players could sound notes below the high, or altissimo, range. For those pitches, there was no strong relationship between resonances in the vocal tract and instrument. Only the pros, however, could break into the altissimo, where a clear relationship emerged: The resonance of the players' vocal tracts was right around that of the note they were playing, the researchers report in Science.

The effect is to amplify the sound of the high notes, which are naturally weak in the sax, Chen says.

But are the pros born with it? Chen thinks not. "They all [said that] to produce the high note at will, they have to think of the note in their head." He takes that to imply a learned relationship born of long, painful hours of practice—which, as we all know, makes perfect.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe