New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Largest Extinction in Earth’s History May Have Been Caused by Microbes

A new theory proposes methane-spurting single-celled organisms were behind the Permian extinctions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

At the end of the Permian period, about 252 million years ago, animals started dying at ferocious rates. In just 20,000 years 90 percent of all species on the planet had gone extinct. What triggered this die-off? Researchers have been trying to figure that out for decades.

Because the scale of the extinctions was so large, paleobiologists and geochemists started looking for an equally massive disaster as the root cause. Some proposed that an asteroid struck Earth, similar to what ended the reign of the dinosaurs. More recently, they have focused on volcanoes in what is now modern-day Siberia that were highly active at the time. They spewed out large amounts of carbon dioxide and methane, an event documented in the chemical signatures of rocks from Xiakou, China. Scientists think that the surge in these gases warmed the planet and made its oceans more acidic, which, together, ultimately snuffed out most life.

In those same rocks, though, Dan Rothman, a geochemist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, saw a discrepancy with the volcano story. The chemical signatures indicated that the concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane kept rising over time. If the gases were the result of volcanic eruptions, one would expect that their levels would rise and then fall back down again. To Rothman and his colleagues, the pattern looked more like a biological factor—not unlike the exponential growth of microbes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In a study published in April in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, the group names a methane-producing single-celled organism, Methanosarcina, as one of the main culprits behind the Permian extinctions.

The new hypothesis does not disregard the influence of the volcanoes. Instead the M.I.T. researchers think that the vast quantities of nickel deposited by the eruptions allowed Methanosarcina to flourish. The microbe, which had acquired the ability to produce methane right around the time of the extinctions, is dependent on nickel to metabolize organic material into the gas. As ocean currents carried the nickel around the globe, the sudden influx allowed Methanosarcina numbers to skyrocket.

That release of large amounts of methane caused temperatures and ocean acidification to increase, and oxygen levels plummeted as O2 was used in the natural conversion of methane to carbon dioxide. Species began to die off. Then Methanosarcina dined on the decomposition and released more methane, triggering a positive feedback loop.

The findings suggest that microbial evolution has important consequences for the evolution of the environment as a whole, Rothman says: “Microbes run this world. We just live in it.”

Some scientists are skeptical that a single microbe played such a big role in the Permian extinctions. Pennsylvania State University geochemist Lee Kump says that Rothman and his colleagues have not proved for certain that this is what happened because they studied only one group of rocks from southern China. “If this phenomenon led to these extinctions, then you would expect to see this in rocks around the world,” he says. “It's something the researchers still need to look for.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe