New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Long and Short of It

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Current understanding divides gamma-ray bursts into those that last less than two seconds and those of longer duration. The latter occur when a massive, young star goes supernova and leaves behind a black hole. The former happen when an old neutron star spirals into a preexisting black hole. The two kinds also differ in the type and intensity of energy released. But GRB060614, detected last June, fits neither category. Its duration of 102 seconds supports the longer-lasting variety, but the intensity of its emissions more closely matches the shorter-lasting one. “All the data seem to point to a new but perhaps not so uncommon kind of cosmic explosion,” says Neil Gehrels of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, lead author of one of four papers in the December 21 Nature describing the phenomenon. Indeed, other bursts also hint at similar “hybrids.” A possible explanation is the creation of black holes so powerful that the dying stars get no chance to supernova.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe