New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Many Faces of Mars

One rover found an ancient desert; the other, a once watery world. The Red Planet's diversity rivals Earth's

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Many people venture into the desert for its starkness and simplicity, but I go there for its complexity. The rocks of western Arizona, where I work, reveal one of the most tangled histories on Earth. Layers of carbonate limestones, silty mudstones, quartz sand and solidified lava show that within the past 600 million years, this area was a warm, shallow sea, then a muddy swamp, then a vast desert of shimmering hot dunes, then a glacial ice sheet, then a shallow sea once again. Erupting volcanoes formed islands like Japan, which in turn got shoved 100 miles onto the continent along massive faults, tilting the rock layers on edge and cooking them to create marble and quartzite. Uplift and erosion at last produced the desert landscape we see today.

This kind of detailed historical reconstruction has long been impossible for Mars. Within my lifetime, the Red Planet has been transformed from a point in the night sky into a land of towering volcanoes, dried-up riverbeds, ancient lakes and windswept lava plains. Clearly, Mars has one of the most glorious histories in the solar system. Yet scientists have been able to piece together only the sketchiest outlines of that history. For years, we have debated such sweeping questions as whether Mars was once "warm and wet" and Earth-like or "cold and dry" and barren like the moon, as though the story of an entire world could be reduced to a sound bite.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe