The Marston Rifle in England

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ibn numer 17. th'IS VIo. " Scientific Amen-. can," we presented an illustrated description of the breech-loading rifle of Wm. W. Mars-ton, of this city, an! stated at the time, that it wason, " the most simple and best hreech load. mg rifle yet presente.d'' We aItso sat.ed thau the cartn'dges 0VbIa.ted the neeeSSI'ty 0f cIean mg. out th.e bidarre, an tllat " 'tI wouJd s.h'me b'nght 'mSI'de after firing a thousand s.h0tSo'" Smce the t'Ime we made use 0f these quoted words, they have been confirmed in correctness by trials which have taken place at Woolwich, in England. We learn by the " London Expositor." (the Times and other Iead'mg papers confirm tlIe account)s th.at Messrs. Moulton & Eustis, from this city, (N. .Y) experimented with the if"farston rifle on the 17th 0f January, at the RIoya A1rsena., WI00WIC'h, m. the presence 0f S.If IJ.,enry Hard'mge, Commander m' Ch'Ief 0f the British !orces,, and 0ther generaIs and officers 0 d'IS t'met'0Ion. ne th first tna.I, persons unaccustomed to the use of this riHe, fired 100 shots in 15 minutes, and after firing a thou. sand shots the bore was perfectly clean. The " Expositor " says, " it seems the most formi. dable, simply constructed, and economical rifle that has yet been produced." Full credit is given to American inventive genius for producing this formidable rifle. The princi. pIe of loading is as applicable to muskets, pistols, fowling-pieces, &c., as to rifles.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 23This article was published with the title “The Marston Rifle in England” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 23 (), p. 177
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican02191853-177d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe