Alzheimer’s May Be Treatable by 2025

Why Obama's "War on Alzheimer's" may pay off

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Government declarations of war on drugs or disease often end in losing battles. That is why some neuroscientists have greeted the Obama administration’s goal of preventing or treating Alzheimer’s by 2025 with skepticism. “Setting target dates for any research program always carries the danger of falsely raising expectations,” says Kenneth S. Kosik, a professor of neuro­science at the University of California, Santa Barbara. “Research does not function like an assembly line in which we can project outcomes.” President Barack Obama signed the National Alzheimer’s Project Act into law more than a year ago, and the White House handed in a draft of the plan to Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius in February. The proposal includes $50 million in new research funding for this year.

The 2025 deadline is not as unrealistic as it might seem. In war, anticipating the enemy’s next move is half the battle, and some of the most meaningful advances in Alzheimer’s research in recent years have to do with reconnaissance. Studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging, positron-emission tomography and spinal taps—and newer methods now in the lab—can detect the effects of the buildup of aberrant proteins char­acteristic of Alzheimer’s some 10 to 15 years before the first symptoms appear. They may be able to go back further, identifying a persistent inflammatory response deep within the brain or capturing the period when mitochondria, the cellular powerhouses, begin spewing toxins as early as middle age. These are normal accompaniments of aging in all of us. For some, however, these changes interact with bad genes or other unidentified risk factors to initiate the torturously slow process that ends with dementia.

Leading research groups are already calculating what they can do with this molecular intelligence report. In February a group of researchers from Case Western Reserve University reported online in Science that a cancer drug with relatively benign side effects was able to rapidly clear from the brains of mice toxic amyloid-beta protein fragments that accompany Alzheimer’s. The compound is headed to human trials and, if it proves its mettle, could perhaps be a prelude to a statinlike drug for dementia.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For now biomarkers, as researchers call them, offer the best hope for establishing a path toward staving off cognitive decline—and for meeting the Obama administration’s ambitious goal.

This article was published in print as "The Mind Recovery Act."

Gary Stix is the former senior editor of mind and brain topics at Scientific American.

More by Gary Stix
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Alzheimer’s May Be Treatable by 2025” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042012-34SSseJdZ6siNGZq0R98Iw

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe