The Motor Torpedo Boat—A New Type

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The purchase by the British Admiralty of the motor-driven torpedo boat, built and successfully tested last winter by Messrs. Yarrow, must be regarded as an official indorsement of a new type of fighting craft. The vessel was built entirely on the responsibility of Messrs. Yarrow, and under the conviction that there would be a wide field of usefulness in store for it, as forming part of the naval defenses of estuaries and harbors. The original idea of the torpedo-boat fiotil- las was that they should consist of a large number of small and comparatively cheap units, each possessing high speed, and exposing only a small area to gun fire. In recent years, however, in the endeavor to secure higher speeds, there has been a steady departure from at least two of these essential principles. The boats have grown larger and more costly, until, from the original size of 75 feet, they have grown to an overall length of 150, with a proportionate increase in the cost. The builders of this craft believe that it will be possible, by making use of internal-combustion engines, to return to first principles in these two respects, without sacrificing too much of the present high speed. The small size of these boats would enable them to form part of the boat equipment of battleships and cruisers. The earlier attempts to carry torpedo boats on warships failed, because the restrictions on size rendered it” impossible to install steam engines of sufficient power

Scientific American Magazine Vol 97 Issue 23This article was published with the title “The Motor Torpedo Boat—A New Type” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 97 No. 23 (), p. 406
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12071907-406c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe