New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The New College Try

Innovation is alive and kicking on campus

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On October 2, 2004, an exceptional group of young people gathered at the National Inventors Hall of Fame in Akron, Ohio. They were there to stack up their inventions against proven winners, such as the cotton gin, the airplane and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for replicating DNA. The 19 undergraduate and graduate students were the finalists in the 14th annual Collegiate Inventors Competition.

Working solo or in teams of two or three, the 19 entrants represented five undergraduate and nine graduate projects. Those final 14 were the survivors of a process that began with the solicitation of applications from 800 colleges and universities worldwide, resulting in 120 submissions.

Steve Mirsky was the winner of a Twist contest in 1962, for which he received three crayons and three pieces of construction paper. It remains his most prestigious award.

More by Steve Mirsky
Scientific American Magazine Vol 292 Issue 2This article was published with the title “The New College Try” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 292 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022005-7prPXnaqzUfap4P4Tat2wh

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe