The New College Try

Innovation is alive and kicking on campus

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On October 2, 2004, an exceptional group of young people gathered at the National Inventors Hall of Fame in Akron, Ohio. They were there to stack up their inventions against proven winners, such as the cotton gin, the airplane and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for replicating DNA. The 19 undergraduate and graduate students were the finalists in the 14th annual Collegiate Inventors Competition.

Working solo or in teams of two or three, the 19 entrants represented five undergraduate and nine graduate projects. Those final 14 were the survivors of a process that began with the solicitation of applications from 800 colleges and universities worldwide, resulting in 120 submissions.

Steve Mirsky was the winner of a Twist contest in 1962, for which he received three crayons and three pieces of construction paper. It remains his most prestigious award.

More by Steve Mirsky
Scientific American Magazine Vol 292 Issue 2This article was published with the title “The New College Try” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 292 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022005-7prPXnaqzUfap4P4Tat2wh

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe