The Odors of Minerals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So accustomed are we to associate odors with plants and flowers that we can scarcely appreciate the fact thr.t certain minerals and ores give off, under certain circumstances, a distinct and characteristic odor. If an ore of arsenic be rubbed until it becomes slightly heated, a distinct smell of garlic will be observed, which, on heating the substance before the flame of the blow-pipe, becomes still more apparent. This odor, which is characteristic of the compounds of arsenic, is termed alliaceous. When selenium or a selenidc is strongly heated, a distinct smell of decayed horse-radish is perceived. This smell, which is peculiar to burning selenium, is known as the horse-radish odor. The odor proceeding from burning sulphur, or the roastiug of a sulphide, readily reveals the presence of tllF_t substance, and is termed sulphureous. When certain varieties of quartz and limestone are strongly rubbed, they give off the odor of rotton eggs. This peculiar smell is occasioned by the evolution of sulphureted hydrogen ; and substances which possess this property are termed fetid. Clays and other substances containing large quantities of alumina afford a peculiar odor when breathed upon ; whilst a few, such as pyrargillite, present the same phenomena when heated. This odor is termed argillaceous, and may frequently be observed in the open air, just as the ground begins to get moistened by a shower.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 18This article was published with the title “The Odors of Minerals” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 18 (), p. 139
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01091858-139a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe