The Phantom Queen

Her majesty’s invisibility cloak is a matter of perspective

Black chess pieces move across a hand-drawn red-and-gray chess- board.

The Phantom Queen Illusion is shown at the top. On the bottom, a behind-the-scenes look reveals the anamorphic camouflage causing the effect.

Matt Pritchard

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Black chess pieces move across a hand-drawn red-and-gray chessboard. A black-framed mirror, placed in front of the board, reflects the progress of rooks and bishops across the space. Except that something is not quite right. The white queen, standing at the center of the board, exists only in the mirror reflection. In the foreground, the physical board’s central squares appear incongruously empty. The Phantom Queen Illusion, conceived by U.K. magician Matt Pritchard, astonished worldwide viewers last December, winning first prize in the 2021 Best Illusion of the Year Contest.

Although Pritchard’s queen appears simultaneously present and absent, this is neither a quantum paradox nor image manipulation. The answer lies in Pritchard’s clever use of anamorphic camouflage, combined with dual—and seemingly incompatible—perspectives. Anamorphic perspective is a type of distorted projection that relies on the viewer assuming a specific vantage point. In Pritchard’s illusion, the critical component is a camouflaged “invisibility cloak,” whose shape and pattern shield the queen from not just one but two viewing angles: the viewer’s vantage point and the mirror’s reflection.

Pritchard devised the deception after reading a book of photography tricks by Walter Wick. “One picture featured an ‘invisible cube’ that was painted to blend in with the background,” he recalls. “The magician within me started to wonder how I could exploit an invisible object in a scene. I decided to use it as an [undetectable] shield to hide an extra object before making it appear.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Next, Pritchard asked himself if he could make a shield that would work from two angles. “After many dozens of attempts, I managed to design a shape and pattern that could work from both sides.. . . Since I was using a checker pattern, a chessboard-themed illusion was a natural choice.” To complete the effect, Pritchard optimized the lighting to remove any telltale shadows from the image.

The last factor in the deceit was the viewer’s own mind and its faulty assumptions. “We’ve become accustomed to looking at a reflection and seeing a reversed image of a scene,” Prichard says. “It’s disarming to find a major discrepancy between the real and the virtual images.”

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

Stephen Macknik is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind. He is also author of Champions of Illusion, along with Susana Martinez-Conde. Follow Macknik on Twitter @stephen_macknik

More by Stephen Macknik
SA Mind Vol 33 Issue 3This article was published with the title “The Phantom Queen” in SA Mind Vol. 33 No. 3 (), p. 42
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0522-42

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe