New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Physics of Toothpaste

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Source: M. CLOITRE/CNRS-ATOFINA

Have you ever wondered why it is that your toothpaste flows like a liquid when you squeeze the tube hard but pulls back like stretched elastic if you squeeze too gently? Scientists from France now have a partial answer: they have found in a series of experiments that pastes behave mechanically much like glass. The insight, reported in this week's issue of Physical Review Letters, may help researchers develop better versions of industrial pastes, such as the additives commonly used in inks. These pastes let the ink flow through printers but stay put on, say, patterned fabrics, like the polka-dot cloth at right. Moreover, this knowledge may shed more light on the physics of glass and other so-called disordered systems in general.

Michel Cloitre and his colleagues at the joint laboratory of the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) and the company ATOFINA in Levallois-Perret, France, tested a paste of tightly packed 200-nanometer-diameter gel particles in a concentrated solution. They placed a thin sample between two plates and applied a twisting force large enough to make the sample flow to the upper plate. Then they removed the stress and watched how the material recovered. Almost immediately, the paste began to spring back, although slowly, and continued to do so for hours on end. This slow recovery is, in fact, typical of glasses. The team also noted that the sample "aged" in that it grew increasingly stiff with time during recovery--another common trait of glass materials. The scientists suggest that the particles are distorted under high stress, and swell and jostle for position upon relaxation, again trying to reach equilibrium. It is because the relief of one particle may come at another's expense, they say, that the process is so slow.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe