The Physics of Toothpaste

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Source: M. CLOITRE/CNRS-ATOFINA

Have you ever wondered why it is that your toothpaste flows like a liquid when you squeeze the tube hard but pulls back like stretched elastic if you squeeze too gently? Scientists from France now have a partial answer: they have found in a series of experiments that pastes behave mechanically much like glass. The insight, reported in this week's issue of Physical Review Letters, may help researchers develop better versions of industrial pastes, such as the additives commonly used in inks. These pastes let the ink flow through printers but stay put on, say, patterned fabrics, like the polka-dot cloth at right. Moreover, this knowledge may shed more light on the physics of glass and other so-called disordered systems in general.

Michel Cloitre and his colleagues at the joint laboratory of the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) and the company ATOFINA in Levallois-Perret, France, tested a paste of tightly packed 200-nanometer-diameter gel particles in a concentrated solution. They placed a thin sample between two plates and applied a twisting force large enough to make the sample flow to the upper plate. Then they removed the stress and watched how the material recovered. Almost immediately, the paste began to spring back, although slowly, and continued to do so for hours on end. This slow recovery is, in fact, typical of glasses. The team also noted that the sample "aged" in that it grew increasingly stiff with time during recovery--another common trait of glass materials. The scientists suggest that the particles are distorted under high stress, and swell and jostle for position upon relaxation, again trying to reach equilibrium. It is because the relief of one particle may come at another's expense, they say, that the process is so slow.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe